Friday, 20 January 2012

Research

Applying Theory


Theorist
Year
Concepts
Your explanation
Application to film
Giroux
1997
Youth as empty category
This theory is where adults create their own impressions of youths which is why most impressions are not realistic. Youths are given an immediate impression and are widely stereotyped.
This theory applies to the film Harry Brown, as this film portrays all youths as violent, abusive, drug-taking thugs. This is a view of other people (the director/the media) and is an un-realistic portrayal of youths as a whole.
This applies to the trailer we saw for Eden Lake in a similar way. The trailer groups all youths together as violent gang members being aggressive towards adults which show that this is how adults perceive all youths.
This applies to Attack the Block differently, as this film shows the youths ending up to be the hero’s. This film puts the message across that not all youths are violent and if people didn’t stereotype them all the time then they could see how normal most youths are.
Acland
1995
Ideology of protection; deviant youth and reproduction of social order
Order has a key function: to reproduce itself.  Youth in crisis, youth gone wild, is a central site in which this activity of reproducing order takes place.  It involves the constitution of the normal, adult, the normal youth, and the relation between the two.  The deviant youth is thus a crucial trope of this relationship; it helps patrol the boundaries

Gramsci
1971 (1929-1935)
Cultural hegemony
Cultural hegemony is that a culturally diverse society can be dominated (ruled) by one social class, by manipulating the societal culture (beliefs, explanations, perceptions, values) so that its ruling-class worldview is imposed as the societal norm, which then is perceived as a universally valid ideology and status quo beneficial to all of society, whilst benefiting only the ruling class.
This theory is shown in Harry Brown, as in this film the lower class dominates in the specific location. The lower, non-working class rules the area of the council estate and if you are not a part of this class then your life becomes very difficult, if not impossible to live. The higher class characters in the film (the police) are shown as threatened by the lower class and are beaten and murdered by them, showing the power the lower class possess here.
Cohen
1972
Moral panic
Society is subjected to periods of moral panic every now and again. This is when an episode, person or group of people seems to become a ‘threat to normal society.’ (E.g. the London riots) This is then presented in a stereotypical and stylised fashion by the mass media. This groups whoever caused the disruption as a whole and gives a bad name to those people in general. (introduction of ASBOs)
This theory applies to Harry Brown, as the group of youths in this film are seen taking drugs, abusing women and others, using weapons, fighting and rioting in London. They are shown as a big threat to the rest of the ‘normal society’ as they are not acting how a ‘normal’ person would be expected to behave. This groups all youths together in these situations and is picked up by the media and stereotypes all youths as thinking this behaviour is acceptable which is not the case.
McRobbie
2004
Symbolic Violence
Creating a symbolic link between the lower classes and violence. Violence against the working class is a form of social reproduction

Gerbner
1986
Cultivation Theory
Influencing society through mass media. Cultivating an attitude about youths and how they behave. If youths are shown as aggressive and violent enough in the media then this is how the majority of youths will believe this is how they should act in reality.




Section B Exemplar Response 48/50

Section B Question 6 Media and Collective Identity

For A2 I have studies the representation of women in both contemporary and historical media. As David Buckingham noted in 2008, “identity is fluid and changeable” – and arguably the identity of women in recent times has changed, some may argue it has become more mediated.

Identity itself refers to who we actually are, the construction of ourselves – perhaps even the representation of ourselves and our social groups that we as media consumers wish to have. While many such as Buckingham and Gauntlett champion the fact the create and construct our own identities; others such aa Theordore Adorno see identity as something pushed upon us by the mass media, that we have no alternative but to take the dominant identities we are exposed to “something is offered for all so that none may escape,” he writes in explanation of this fact. Adorno therefore argues that our identities are becoming increasingly mediated – that is, that they influenced by the mass media, inherent identifies are weak and influenced by the media around us. ‘Nuts’ magazine is a stereotypical ‘lad’s mag’, aimed at 18-24 year old males. In ana analysis of the 19-25th March 2010 issue I performed the content proves interesting with regards to representation of women. Images of semi-naked females in suggestive poses represent women as victims of symbiotic annihilation. They are portrayed as merely objects of sexual pleasure for men – the images have been constructed, Laure Mulvey would argue with her theory of the Male Gaze, solely with the male consumers in mind, who using the Uses and Gratifications Model are consuming the text for sexual pleasure. Most significant here, however, is the so-called Mirror Effect of Mulvey’s Male Gaze. This states that women themselves consuming the images will apply the Male Gaze, and see the female in the image in a sense of what Baudrillard would call hyperreality, assuming the idea that this representation is ‘how women should be’ and in turn they should construct their identities similarly in order to appeal to males – aftr all women are the subdominant group in an apparent patriarchal society. Identity therefore has become mediated in this situation as Adorno says. The “culture industry” that is the mass media has imposed a dominant representation onto a collective group; who have felt pressured to adapt it as part of their collective identity. In the 2001 film “Lara Croft: Tomb Raider”, Lara Croft, the main female character is represented as fairly masculine (stereotypically masculine) in terms of her choice of clothing, body language and manner. All of these micro-elements construct her identity. However, throughout the film, we also see Croft use what can be considered the concept of femininity to her advantage, flirting with male characters and wearing stereotypically feminine clothes towards the final scenes.
In terms of her character’s identity this supports Buckingham’s aforementioned assumption that “identity is fluid and changeable” but also conforms to Queer Theory. Queer Theory is widely recognized in Judith Butler’s 1990 book ‘Gender Trouble’ and states that the genders male and female are just as much the product of representation as the concepts of masculinity and femininity. She calls for a blurring of boundaries between genders and their stereotypical identities and calls for the media to celebrate such diversity. As a character, Croft arguably has blurred the boundaries displaying traits of both male and female behaviour.

If Adorno’s assertions are applied here it can be argued that again the dominant identity of women as sly, untrustworthy and in need of patriarchal dominance is being applied through Croft’s deviant use of fronting identity to her advantage. However some could argue that the prominence of Queer Theory does not encourage the mediation of female identity instead it encourages dominant representations to be characterized and boundaries to be blurred – implying greater personal control over identity as advocated by John Fiske and David Buckingham rather than mediated identities. Cosmopolitan is a magazine aimed at females around 30+. In all ways it can be said that pragmatically the magazine pushes femininity as an identity for itself, with stereotypically female colours and text styles. In turn, the feminine identity of the magazine is applied as a representation of the readers, further suggesting a mediation of women’s identity. The magazine focuses heavily on beauty and fitness, reinforcing the dominant ideology of the “ideal” women that women should aspire to a fixed concept of beauty.

As an example in the April 2010 issue a large image of Holly Willoughby (celebrity) features on the cover. Although unlike Nuts magazine, she is wearing fairly covering clothing and lacks cosmetic make-up, it is interesting to note that her clothing is white in colourFerdinand de Saussure would note that this has semiotic significance using his semiotic theory and Roland Barthe’s levels of signification, we can identify that white has connotations of innocence and weakness. Therefore this represents her as innocent and weak – reinforcing dominant patriarchal representations of women. Due to her status as a celebrity, her level of influence is great. In herself she is a semiotic symbol of success and affluence, so those who take inspiration from her will take this constructed innocence and weakness and apply it to their own identities. This is a clear example of the mediation of identity. It suggests a passive audience, influenced by the mass media as Adorno and other quasi-Marxists would suggest.
It can be seen therefore, that as post modernists say, we live in a media saturated society. We are surrounded by signs which cannot be ignored. Women in the media are often represented as varying, whether it be as sexual objects for the pleasure of males; or as innocent, as ‘stay at home’ housewives as suggested in 2008’s film Hancock. Here, despite possessing stereotypically male strength and ‘superpowers’, the lead female aspires to be a housewife – reinforcing the sub-dominant representation of women. Either way however women are often the victims of mediation. The theories of consumption and construction of identity from theorists such as Adorno and Mulvey clearly show that despite the specific representations, one common identity is ‘forced’ upon women in the media – a subdominant social group living in a patriarchal society. Identity is constructed using this as a basis; and even media texts which challenge this representation and encourage Queer Theory diversity are still arguably mediating identity with their influence. Identity is fluid and changeable and can be individually constructed as Gauntlett and Buckingham state. But arguable, the mass media are, and have, mediated the identity of women in contemporary society.
 EAA (explanation and analysis) 20/20
EG (example) 18/20
T (termanology) 10/10
(48)


 ‘How are British youths represented in Quadrophenia and Harry Brown?’



Main themes

In both films Quadrophenia (Franc Roddam, 1979) and Harry Brown, (Daniel Barber, 2009) the main themes are very similar. Both films are portraying British youths in a very negative way. Drugs, sex and violence are very common in both Quadrophenia and Harry Brown. Quadrophenia shows how British youths were viewed 30 years ago. They are shown as disruptive, rude teens that abuse the use of drugs and work in gangs. However the extent of the violence and drug taking is not as extreme as in Harry Brown. The youths in Quadrophenia are seen at times to get into fights and beat up members of their rival gang ‘rockers,’ whereas the youths Harry Brown are seen to murder numerous members of their society, sometimes unprovoked. The youths in Harry Brown don’t feel safe unless walking around their community with a knife or gun at hand. Territory and revenge are also key themes running through both films. The Mods and the Rockers in Quadrophenia both feel that they need to protect their territory from the opposition, and this feeling of protection is what leads to violence. However this territory feeling is much more extreme in Harry Brown. The youths see the underground walkway as their territory, and any intruders are usually murdered. Harry Brown himself sees revenge as the main theme of the whole plot, as he is constantly seeking revenge on the youths that murdered his friend.

Gang ideologies

The youths in both of these films are strongly led by gangs. The Mods and the Rockers in Quadrophenia stick together in trying to overcome the rival gang. Both gangs pride themselves on their dress code and their scooters. In Quadrophenia, the gangs are less of a threat than the gangs in Harry Brown. The gangs in Harry Brown are formed more for survival. This fits in to Gramsci’s theory of Cultural hegemony as the gangs are constantly fighting against the different social classes. The Mods and the Rockers are more like friendship groups that can get carried away at times; however the gangs in Harry Brown all become blurred towards the end as they all begin to fight between themselves. The Mods and Rockers are two clear cut different groups, whereas the youths in Harry Brown are much more out for themselves, but sometimes go around in groups to seem more intimidating. Throughout Harry Brown, the members of the gangs are all individually fighting for survival and will at any point turn on a member of their own gang if necessary. The gangs in Quadrophenia are also fighting against their parents as well as each other, whereas the parents are hardly ever featured in Harry Brown.

Identity

Identity is a key feature in both of these films. In both Harry Brown and Quadrophenia each character is fighting to be at the top, and the most indestructible. The identity of the Mods and the rockers in Quadrophenia are important as the clash between the two groups is what causes most of the conflict in the film. The Mods are all dressed in green parkers and ride scooters to show that they are a member of the Mods gang, and the Rockers dress in leather jackets with their hair combed backwards to show they are members of the Rockers. The characters in Harry Brown all dress very threateningly, in hooded jumpers and baggy, dark clothing. This hides their individual identities, causing them to come across as much more threatening. The youths in Harry Brown don’t seem to possess an identity as they are constantly hiding behind clothing, hoods or in the dark alley ways. The youths in Quadrophenia however, never hide away and are always out in the day light, which takes away that aspect of fear for them.

Roles of the parents

The parents of the youths in Quadrophenia are featured for a little part of the film. At first the parents of the ‘Mod’ Jimmy, seem that they have little control over him, as he is always out late at night and let him get away with things without harsh consequences. However towards the end of the film Jimmy’s parents punish him and throw him out the house. The parents of the youths in Harry Brown are hardly featured in the film and are insignificant to the film. The youths have little guidance from their parents, causing them to think that they can get away with anything they want to do as they will not be punished. However the youths in Harry Brown seem so out of control now that any guidance or punishment from parents or a family member would be ignored and irrelevant.

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

How do contemporary media represent British youth and youth culture in different ways?

Harry Brown: 2009, Daniel Barber

How does Harry Brown represent young people?
- Pitbulls
- Drugs
- Guns
- Knives
- Violence
- Hoodies
- Location - impact on their representation and life
- Sexual confrontation
- Gender representation
- Male dominantion, treatment towards women
- Sexism
- Revenge
- Colloquial language/swearing
- Territory
- Binary opposition: good vs bad - Harry Brown/Police/Gags - Social classes
- Age
- Dark lighting/dark characters

Hoodies strike fear in British cinema
'Guardian 2009'
How is suggests young people are represented
- Unemotional
- Inact of feelings
- Reflect them being monsters
- Challenge equilibruim

The links to horror genre
- Teens are now 'baddies' in horror films
- Non fiction is more scarry than fiction
- Real life murderers

The significance of social class
- Living on a council estate shapes a bad character
- Surrounded by violence will shape individuals
- Survival is harder/resort to more violence to live
- Prey on higer class people
- Hegemony - Ruling of the higher class/wanting to make others believe the same
- ASBO's, media coverage

The implications of the representations
- Fear as a nation
- Moral panic
- Grouping people together/generalising youths as 'thugs'
- Begin to act like the stereotype

Eden Lake: 2008, James Watkins

How are Jenny and Steve (the main couple) represented?
Jenny and Steve are represented as a normal middle aged couple. Middle class, average couple, loving and caring couple. They stand up to the thugs but still stay calm. Throughout the trailer you can see them becoming more scared and frightened of the youths. By the end of the trailer the main character in the couple is Jenny, suggesting that Steve has been killed, making the adults seem weaker as now the male is gone and Jenny is alone to fight for herself.

How is this contrasted with the representation of the other characters?
The thugs are a lot younger than the couple and there are many more of them, instantly showing that they will have the upper hand if trouble started. They way the youths dress shows the difference in social class, and they way that they speak and use colloquial language shows they will be of a lower class background and environment. The gang of youths have a vicious, fighting rotweiler which shows danger and their weapon.

How important is the issue of social class?
The issue of social class in these films is one of the most important factors to consider. The youth's backgrounds and environment will shape all of their characters and if they have been brought up in a run down, council estate with violence being normal around them, then they will grow up to believe that this is allowed and right. This will then shape their actions for later life as this is what they have been brought up with all their lives so far. One of the youths carries a knife in his pocket, showing that he is prepared to use violence easily. They youths can see that Jenny and Steve are in 'their territory' and so will be protective.

How are young people represented?
In Eden Lake, the young people are represented as violent, disrespectful thugs. They are shown as hanging around in gangs, in quite secluded areas in order to start trouble with anyone. They are portrayed as being fightening and making others feel threatened and uncomfortable. Reflects middle class fear of working youth and their perceived threat to hegemony.

Normality - Dominant ideologies
Todorov's theory - Disruption to the equilibrium

Attack the Block: 2011, Jor Cornish
How are the youths represented?
- In gangs
- Bandannas around their faces
- Colloquial language used within the gang
- Territory, her going in to their land
- Not as treatening, they were scared of the explosion
- Weak pack
- Making fun of other youths who act like this seriously
- Contrast to other 'hoodie horror films'

Harry Brown film review

Rotton Tomato

Academy Award nominee Daniel Barber (The Tonto Woman) makes his feature directorial debut with this gritty critique on contemporary British society starring Michael Caine as an elderly shut-in who's spurred to action by a senseless act of violence. Harry Brown (Caine) resides in a desolate public-housing apartment block as his sickly wife lies dying in a local hospital. He spends most of his days in solitude, only getting out to play the occasional game of chess at a nearby pub with his best friend, Leonard (David Bradley). The days of basic human decency seem to be a thing of the past, because in recent years barbarous drug dealers and gangsters have overtaken the dilapidated complex. Killing is a way of life for these young thugs, and as a result overburdened detectives Frampton (Emily Mortimer) and Hicock (Charlie Creed-Miles) are essentially relegated to knocking on doors and notifying parents when their children have been killed in the latest fracas, instead of investigating the crimes and jailing the guilty parties. When Leonard is murdered just feet from his own apartment, former Royal Marine Harry utilizes the skills he learned while fighting the IRA to take on the aggressive chavs who have intimidated the police into inaction. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

Time Out London

I ended up feeling a bit sorry for Michael Caine by the time this hateful vigilante flick set in modern-day London came to a close. Did the old boy know what he was getting into? The funny thing is that ‘Harry Brown’, bar a violent prologue, begins fairly soberly, even reflectively, as if the makers were thinking more of ‘All or Nothing’ than ‘Death Wish’. Harry (Caine, below) is a widower who shuffles around a crumbling housing estate with only fellow army vet Leonard (David Bradley) for company. But life changes when Leonard falls prey to the hoodies who linger in the local underpass. When distraught Harry gets short shrift from the police (badly written, and poorly played by Emily Mortimer and Charlie Creed-Miles), he decides to take the law into his own hands and drives this already wobbly wagon straight into hysterical genre territory. By now, all you can do is sigh, laugh and try not to get upset at the stupidity of it all.

Although it takes a while before ‘Harry Brown’ shows its true colours, there’a a vulgar whiff from the off: in the first seconds of this debut from director Daniel Barber (who, technically, shows a fair amount of talent) we watch grainy mobile footage of a kid on a scooter as he confronts a young mum and shoots her dead before he comes a cropper himself on the road. It’s horrible stuff, but there must be a good reason for it, surely?

As it turns out, this scene is a random first glimpse of a warped portrait of our city that’s straight out of the Daily Mail – a place where your granny might get shot, stabbed or battered at every turn. It’s also the first hint of the sick ideology of the film, in which ill-informed pessimism is bolstered by childish ideas of revenge. There’s always a punishment around the corner, not only to avenge bad behaviour but also to give the makers sneaky licence to indulge in violence. As narrative – and moral – maths go, this is a cooking of the books that sidesteps any smart commentary on real life.

Attack the Block review

From Time Out London

It’s always worrying when an artist you admire in one field decides to branch out into another. Bob Dylan’s painting career, Russell Crowe’s band 30 Odd Foot of Grunts, the novels of William Shatner – are all destined for the trash pile of cultural history. But on the strength of his feature debut, ‘Attack the Block’, it’s already clear that, in a decade’s time, no one will even remember that Joe Cornish used to be a comedian.

At first glance, it looks as though Cornish has set the bar low for his first movie. A storyline inspired by the ’80s genre movies he grew up with (and lovingly parodied on ‘The Adam and Joe Show’), tied to a currently popular film fad – the London yoof movie – and set literally on his doorstep, ‘Attack the Block’ could easily have been a lazy, smug sci-fi parody: ‘Morons from Outer Space’ goes gangsta.

But, like the aliens that rampage through a Brixton tower block, this is an entirely unexpected beast. An unrecognisably well-spoken Jodie Whittaker plays Sam, the jobbing nurse whose decision to move into a south London estate backfires when she’s first mugged by teen thugs, then chased by marauding monsters. But Whittaker, and comic relief Nick Frost as weed dealer Ron, are merely the audience-friendly commercial face of ‘Attack the Block’. The real stars are those thugs, led by taciturn wannabe player Moses (John Boyega, stunning), whose decision to tool up and defend their turf kicks the plot into high gear.

And this is an astonishingly fast-moving film. Cornish doesn’t do eerie build-ups or character-establishing dialogue scenes: it’s pedal to the metal from the word go, and we learn on the hoof about Moses’s family issues, Ron’s business troubles and the complex relationships within the gang.

This can make the opening scenes confusing: there are a lot of characters to keep up with. But it pays off in pure adrenaline: we’re never given a second to settle, and the result is exhilarating. Gradually characters emerge, and it’s here that Cornish’s skill as writer and director becomes evident. These kids start out as caricatures – the moody leader, the speccy geek, the mouth – but the respect shown to them is hugely refreshing, and their progressions are heartfelt and wholly believable: Shane Meadows would be proud.

All of which elevates ‘Attack the Block’ from fun creature-feature throwback to this year’s unmissable British movie, and Cornish from just another geek-turned-filmmaker to a major talent: if he can strike a similar balance between sympathy, insight and crowd-pleasing thrills in future projects, his status is assured.

‘Attack the Block’ isn’t perfect – the aliens are a tad unremarkable and the final blowout never hits the frenzied peak it might have – but it’s hard to imagine British audiences having more fun in a cinema this year. Now, who’s going to fund the Adam Buxton movie?

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

What is identity?

1. The collective aspect of the set of characteristics by which a thing is definitively recognizable or known
2. The set of behavioral or personal characteristics by which an individual is recognizable as a member of a group.
3. The quality or condition of being the same as something else.
4. The distinct personality of an individual regarded as a persisting entity; individuality.
5. Information, such as an identification number, used to establish or prove a person's individuality.
How is identity formed? Who influences your identity?
- Environment
- Friend
- Family
- Events
- Social origin
- Education
- Beliefs and ideologies
- Religion
- Gender
- Characteristics
- Media/media consumption
- Music
- Diet
- Age
- Lifestyle